ArtefactNoDia SOUND from Alyssa Brookes on Vimeo.
Following
on from my fourth Artefact I decided to use the same animation but add sound
and cinematography to see whether the audience empathised with the animation
the same or even more. When researching
further into cinematography, I found three rules that cinematographers most
commonly break down.
“Rule
1: when going from a wide to a close shot, keep your character on the
same side of the screen – if he was on the left in the wide shot, don’t frame him
on the right in the close shot.
Rule 2: when intercutting between two people,
their glances must always face in the opposite direction if the viewers are to
feel that they’re looking at one other. Don’t make them look towards the same
side of the screen or they’ll both appear to be looking in the same direction.
Rule 3: when a character moves between shots,
he should move in the same direction on screen in each one. If he doesn’t, it
will look like he’s changed direction.” (Unknown, 2011)
I felt that rule one was the most
important focus to my animated scene. When involving cameras using Artefact
four, I wanted to use it as a build up to her emotion when she starts reading
the letter. A slow inwards pace, as her emotional state is quite nervous mixed
with excitement.
As for choosing the right sound for
this piece of animation, it was quite understandable and clear that I wasn’t
going to choose any rock, pop, hip hop etc sort of sounds. Overall it was
pretty obvious a slow, soft sound effect would work nicely to the build up
throughout the scene.
The feedback for my final Artefact was
successful. The most important reaction I wanted from the audience was to
empathise more with the character due to the sound and camera movement. They
all felt a difference from looking back at my fourth Artefact and then watching
my fifth. They also mentioned that the sound worked perfectly for the scene, as
it had a build up to the end when she holds the letter over her heart which
enhanced the anticipation through story telling. Although, I feel another pass
at animating more anticipated movements would benefit the scene even more
effectively.
As this is my final Artefact I feel I
have covered a wide range of areas that express interior monologue within a
character performance through research and practice. However there is so much
more out there that I could experiment through inner feelings that I would love
to explore further.
ArtefactNoDia from Alyssa Brookes on Vimeo.
My fourth artefact involves a character performance using no
dialogue, sound or cinematography. Therefore the story telling was completely
up to myself and how I portrayed this to capture my character’s inner feelings
with the audience.
When planning what my character was going to do and it’s
back story, I researched some existing pantomime character animations to see
how they express body language without sound. I found that the acting choices
for doing a character performance without dialogue are even more important to
be able to capture the audience, as the audience is basing it solely on the
animated performance.
After research and planning I decided again, to animate a
more subtle and emotional scene involving a young girl that see’s a letter on
the table, goes over to read the letter and then shows her final reaction. I
feel this was going to work well due to the build up through the story telling.
The audience will be waiting to know what her reaction is going to be after
reading the letter.
Following on from subtext and blinks, I felt this gave me a
huge opportunity to expand on these within this Artefact. After reading a quote from Shawn Kelly “When
we’re having an idea, or when we’re switching from one emotion to another, or
when we’re realising something. Those are the gold-mines in terms of blinks –
that’s when a perfectly placed blink will take a scene from being merely ‘good’
and make it ‘great’.” (Shawn Kelly, 2009) it made me focus on my character’s
big change of emotion during the scene, which is where this quote and blinking
becomes vital.
For this particular Artefact I decided to act out the scene
myself as a reference. As spoken about in my research document. This was good
to focus on the natural movements that I made and improved my skills when
animating the scene. In the focus group I showed the animation with my
reference next to it and then another time without it.
The overall feedback from the audience was good and they all
felt the emotion I was trying to put portray. Although there was a little
debate on what the letter was, some people thought it was a University
acceptance letter and a couple of others thought it was a love letter. When
writing a description for the background of the character, it was actually a
University acceptance letter. However, either way everyone connected with the
character in the same way.
Even so the audience felt the emotion they mentioned a few
things about the poses and animating throughout the scene. The hands didn’t
seem very natural, the head was posed quite vertical and some of the poses
within the reference weren’t used as well as they could have been, such as the
characters elbows were sticking out when mine in the reference wasn’t. However,
they thought some of the acting choices worked well, when she holds the letter
to where her heart is at the end means that the letter means something strongly
to her.
With my findings for this Artefact I thought it would be
great to expand it as my fifth Artefact by experimenting with sound and
cinematography. I therefore took another pass at this Artefact which is the one
shown above. I feel my conclusion on my final Artefact will determine whether
sound can enhance the connection between the character’s emotions and audience.